I have a sinking feeling that the feds are not going to let this go. the general public now sees the left as dangerous people who are willing to shoot a president. that's bad optics.
They desperately want a MAGA hat toting midlife chud to go on a rampage. there is nothing the feds want more than for and obvious Trump supporter to commit a mass murder, which just so happens to be captured live on television from several different angles.
I know we all already basically do this, but avoid leftist gathering spots until the election is over. don't go to concerts, don't go to pride parades, avoid nerd conventions, avoid gay orgies, and for God's sake don't go to a leftist political rally.
And for the love of god, keep a cool head and don't do anything stupid.
the mark of either a paid infiltrator or a man so stupid he may as well be one. refute my remarks, don't just call me your version of "racist".
is that what i was talking about? is that the only sort of violence that exists - "counter attacks"? is the only thing that you can do, in your eyes, going out and shooting randos in a grocery store?
have you checked you aren't the victim of a second-wave MKULTRA or something similar? your brain seems neutered, because it believes it'll win against the largest soft genocide attempted in history via singing kumbaya and the power of friendship, and that anything else may as well be the airport scene from Call of Duty.
what even are you talking about then? In a thread about avoiding being caught up in a mass casualty event, your first reply is
a reasonable interpretation of the statement, given the context, is that you are making fun of the idea of not committing a mass casualty event, so I replied in kind. your response was essentially.
you proceed to talk about being violent "only when it counts", to which a reasonable interpretation would be you were talking about targeting administration for the people in charge. since this is in the context of a thread about an assassination attempt on Donald Trump, I reasonably assumed that you were talking about some sort of retaliation.
you claim I am not representing your position? so what the fuck is your position?
it was a bit more than that you were insinuating mate
yea you thought i was talking about going on full No Russian and killing jack and jill to get back at bergstein didn't ya
so what are you talking about then? clearly I don't understand. elaborate
well, look, two points, basically:
this talk about "retaliations" and "don't go on massacres guys!" and "don't BE massacred guys, hide in a basement!" sounds like you're writing an announcement on a Roblox military group. it's just, not... relevant? Americans on this board are more likely to get killed by a crimer while buying a hamburger than they are to get caught up in a only-sorta-likely ZOG psyop "retaliation" massacre. this part is silly, but i can only blame you for the second part:
you use the above (fake) pretense of super likely senseless civilian violence to create an air of all violence, period, being bad. this is plain wrong and the downfall of every starry-eyed right-leaning person, online or otherwise. it is objective, undeniable fact (that for purposes of not getting this informative comment removed, i naturally, of course, super don't endorse!! don't kill anyone guys!!) that if a hundred people on our side successfully repeated what the Trump assassin attempted, we would win. if key figures of destruction were removed from the face of Mother Earth, we would win. that's what winning IS. if the people who stir up the agitprop and make all of our other actions ineffective are gone, they can't agitprop themselves out of their own deaths.
this isn't deniable, it plain isn't. it's uncouth, yes. it's unpleasant. if it was a walk in the park it would've been done long ago. but it is what we're going to need to soberly accept going forward, such that we may plan around it accordingly. meandering around telling people not to go to nerd conventions to avoid the next CIA kid given an AR-15 is missing the point and fogging up the discussion. that's what i'm trying to get across.