That's just collateral damage. If you read feminist academia, their true and only goal is not to "stop oppression of women", but to eradicate men.
it isn’t women wielding that cudgel - it’s women being wielded, and more importantly that’s only one tool among many in the armament rack
What basis do you have for this? This narrative died after October 7th. Common sense says Jews would not prop up a movement that openly hates their religion, their nation and their people.
Every single fight we're in traces back to a feminist call.
Trans ideology was trumpeted by Solanas as the only way men could be allowed to exist - as facsimiles of women that serve women.
Race war is directly referenced in "Masculinities" by Raewyn Connell, where the author states that an anti-sexist movement must create division among men, not solidarity.
The collapse of the economy through hyper-inflation was also suggested by Solanas, who wanted to destroy the monetary system.
The wielder isn’t “Jews” either imp. They, like women, are among the wielded.
In the armament rack alongside Feminism are some related weapons, such as Zionism, Bolshevism, Globalism, Usury-Based Capitalism, Consumerism, Terrorism, Trust-the-Plan-ism, and so on
Imagine a world where nobody lends money unless you're popular enough.
People always flag it up, yet nobody pauses to think how ridiculous it would be if interest on loans didn't exist. Flat fees don't compensate based on risk.
I've seen these kind of things. The wealthy do fund and profit off war. They profit off any major event, really. It's a lack of morals, but it's nothing unique. A lot of poor people do the same but their gains are proportionately lower.
Hell, your pension fund probably profits off war. I know someone who made big money buying ADRs of Israeli defense companies after October 7th.
I don't buy defense stocks. Profiting off male deaths is awful.
Back to my original point...how on earth would a banking system without interest work? Every logical implementation turns finance into a popularity contest where only those popular in the community get funding.
That's just collateral damage. If you read feminist academia, their true and only goal is not to "stop oppression of women", but to eradicate men.
What basis do you have for this? This narrative died after October 7th. Common sense says Jews would not prop up a movement that openly hates their religion, their nation and their people.
Every single fight we're in traces back to a feminist call.
Trans ideology was trumpeted by Solanas as the only way men could be allowed to exist - as facsimiles of women that serve women.
Race war is directly referenced in "Masculinities" by Raewyn Connell, where the author states that an anti-sexist movement must create division among men, not solidarity.
The collapse of the economy through hyper-inflation was also suggested by Solanas, who wanted to destroy the monetary system.
The wielder isn’t “Jews” either imp. They, like women, are among the wielded.
In the armament rack alongside Feminism are some related weapons, such as Zionism, Bolshevism, Globalism, Usury-Based Capitalism, Consumerism, Terrorism, Trust-the-Plan-ism, and so on
Imagine a world where nobody lends money unless you're popular enough.
People always flag it up, yet nobody pauses to think how ridiculous it would be if interest on loans didn't exist. Flat fees don't compensate based on risk.
All wars are banker’s wars
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/17t1yIErpL/old-news-for-some-perhaps-a-miss/c
I've seen these kind of things. The wealthy do fund and profit off war. They profit off any major event, really. It's a lack of morals, but it's nothing unique. A lot of poor people do the same but their gains are proportionately lower.
Hell, your pension fund probably profits off war. I know someone who made big money buying ADRs of Israeli defense companies after October 7th.
I don't buy defense stocks. Profiting off male deaths is awful.
Back to my original point...how on earth would a banking system without interest work? Every logical implementation turns finance into a popularity contest where only those popular in the community get funding.