It is, even if you don't realize it. You're claiming that liberalism necessarily evolves into woke totalitarianism. Which implies that liberalism contains within itself the seeds of woke totalitarianism that will inevitably manifest through a process of internal conflict. That liberalism itself is unstable due to its contradictions which can only be resolved through a process of adversarial discourses and social conflicts.
Otherwise knows as historicism, by claiming that liberalism can only evolve in one specific direction you imply that liberalism contains a particular dialectic and that this dialectic has a fixed logical endpoint.
That’s not what I’m suggesting at all. Maybe you should look up what those words mean first.
It is, even if you don't realize it. You're claiming that liberalism necessarily evolves into woke totalitarianism. Which implies that liberalism contains within itself the seeds of woke totalitarianism that will inevitably manifest through a process of internal conflict. That liberalism itself is unstable due to its contradictions which can only be resolved through a process of adversarial discourses and social conflicts.
Otherwise knows as historicism, by claiming that liberalism can only evolve in one specific direction you imply that liberalism contains a particular dialectic and that this dialectic has a fixed logical endpoint.
So you're at least in Hegelian territory.
bottom text