Not surprising, let's be honest the Japanese during WW2 probably didn't have the best reputation (cough Unit 731, Rape of Nanjing, treatment of Allied POWs) that would lead to them wanting to have these former psychopaths have guns again.
Which ironically led to them getting rid of their entire military, replacing it with a self defence force and having to have the US stationed there permanently which built up resentment thanks to some of the actions of soldiers stationed there.
I think they did the same to Germans too if memory serves right, only thanks to the Berlin Airlift happening so quickly after, it made them backtrack quickly to Germany NEEDS a military again.
You know that the Allied powers were disarming not just the Japanese military but the Japanese CIVILIANS right? i thought you would understand that the civilians are not the military nor the government. The whole argument over civilians having the right to have guns is so that they can fight the government is it not? and yet the Allied powers obviously didnt believe in that as they disarmed the Japanese civilians
Yeah the 'victorious side' was retarded with that belief, it's only fortunate America had it written centuries earlier as the 2nd ammendment and even THEN there's been constant gun grabs.
Not surprising, let's be honest the Japanese during WW2 probably didn't have the best reputation (cough Unit 731, Rape of Nanjing, treatment of Allied POWs) that would lead to them wanting to have these former psychopaths have guns again.
Which ironically led to them getting rid of their entire military, replacing it with a self defence force and having to have the US stationed there permanently which built up resentment thanks to some of the actions of soldiers stationed there.
I think they did the same to Germans too if memory serves right, only thanks to the Berlin Airlift happening so quickly after, it made them backtrack quickly to Germany NEEDS a military again.
You know that the Allied powers were disarming not just the Japanese military but the Japanese CIVILIANS right? i thought you would understand that the civilians are not the military nor the government. The whole argument over civilians having the right to have guns is so that they can fight the government is it not? and yet the Allied powers obviously didnt believe in that as they disarmed the Japanese civilians
Most of the allied powers don't believe in civilians having the right to have guns in the first place.
Yeah the 'victorious side' was retarded with that belief, it's only fortunate America had it written centuries earlier as the 2nd ammendment and even THEN there's been constant gun grabs.
Exactly my point