JP is correct when he says that identifying yourself by your race is retarded. it might be different in Europe where race is more tied to geographical borders, but it certainly not the case in North America.
Most people inherently identify by race you dumb retard, what's the first thing immigrants to in other countries? They connect with other immigrants of their ethnicity, you can see this with muzzies all the time. The same way you'd feel out of place if you were to walk down the street in Nigeria as a white person.
If intelligence and competence aren't tied to race, whites and eastern asians wouldn't be the only races capable of creating civilizations worth living in. The only African country that was ever worth living in as a non african was the South African republic, and that was thanks to white people, I know numerous people who went to work in SA and not as labourers, as engineers, and they were very prosperous whilst working there, and that was in the 80s, now I have not heard a single person willingly go to SA, hell even people who live in SA hate it, now I'll let you connect the dots and tell me what changed between current SA and the one from the 80s.
Same with the US, 50s were the era of glory and prosperity, and look at you now, again if you've solved the previous SA puzzle, I'll give you another one, what changed in the mighty US of A since the 50s? Hint: it began in the 60s.
You said North America, Canada is the same. So if there are no differences in intelligence and competence between races, why does a shift in __________ (you fill in the blanks if you've solved your puzzles) deteriorate a country?
This is not to say there aren't clever non whites/asians, but you'd have to be an absolute idiot to still ignore basic statistics and 1000s of years of tracked history, unlike a certain some who never tracked their own history due to being incompetent.
If intelligence and competence aren't tied to race, whites and eastern asians wouldn't be the only races capable of creating civilizations worth living in.
Iran, Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Argentina. not saying these nations are perfect, but they are developed and largely civilized within their borders.
50s were the era of glory and prosperity, and look at you now, again if you've solved the previous SA puzzle, I'll give you another one, what changed in the mighty US of A since the 50s? Hint: it began in the 60s.
The US also saw massive glory and prosperity in the 70s, 90s, and even 00s. Much of the deterioration in the times between was caused by a financial and political bubbles popping.
You said North America, Canada is the same. So if there are no differences in intelligence and competence between races, why does a shift in __________ (you fill in the blanks if you've solved your puzzles) deteriorate a country?
because mass immigration does not encourage immigrants to adopt the new culture. couple this with most immigrants going on government welfare, and you end up getting the bottom of the barrel immigrating into your country.
you'd have to be an absolute idiot to still ignore basic statistics and 1000s of years of tracked history,
statistics has bearing on population outcomes, but individual outcomes are quite removed. when viewing population statistics, a sample of even 1% encompasses hundreds of thousands of people.
JP is correct when he says that identifying yourself by your race is retarded. it might be different in Europe where race is more tied to geographical borders, but it certainly not the case in North America.
Most people inherently identify by race you dumb retard, what's the first thing immigrants to in other countries? They connect with other immigrants of their ethnicity, you can see this with muzzies all the time. The same way you'd feel out of place if you were to walk down the street in Nigeria as a white person.
If intelligence and competence aren't tied to race, whites and eastern asians wouldn't be the only races capable of creating civilizations worth living in. The only African country that was ever worth living in as a non african was the South African republic, and that was thanks to white people, I know numerous people who went to work in SA and not as labourers, as engineers, and they were very prosperous whilst working there, and that was in the 80s, now I have not heard a single person willingly go to SA, hell even people who live in SA hate it, now I'll let you connect the dots and tell me what changed between current SA and the one from the 80s.
Same with the US, 50s were the era of glory and prosperity, and look at you now, again if you've solved the previous SA puzzle, I'll give you another one, what changed in the mighty US of A since the 50s? Hint: it began in the 60s.
You said North America, Canada is the same. So if there are no differences in intelligence and competence between races, why does a shift in __________ (you fill in the blanks if you've solved your puzzles) deteriorate a country?
This is not to say there aren't clever non whites/asians, but you'd have to be an absolute idiot to still ignore basic statistics and 1000s of years of tracked history, unlike a certain some who never tracked their own history due to being incompetent.
And people are retarded
Iran, Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Argentina. not saying these nations are perfect, but they are developed and largely civilized within their borders.
The US also saw massive glory and prosperity in the 70s, 90s, and even 00s. Much of the deterioration in the times between was caused by a financial and political bubbles popping.
because mass immigration does not encourage immigrants to adopt the new culture. couple this with most immigrants going on government welfare, and you end up getting the bottom of the barrel immigrating into your country.
statistics has bearing on population outcomes, but individual outcomes are quite removed. when viewing population statistics, a sample of even 1% encompasses hundreds of thousands of people.
You just listed a bunch of caucausoid nations lol.
pretty sure everyone here would call them Middle Eastern and Hispanic in any other context