so.. a 12 year old is old enough to change genders/sex, which means they have a concept of sex. but this old dude messaging and flirting a 17 year old is all of a sudden "oh no... minor". i know i said previously, that it is whatever unless he was grooming the individual. no way to tell what was this "flirting". if he said "you are a pretty, young girl". it can be seen as flirting or a complement.
ive seen enough To Catch A Predator to know its only illegal if they send dick picks or ask to meet up. lol.
He was investigated and found just as guilty as gamergate!
Which is to say: no charge, no filings, no record addendums.
If the reason behind this is a "reasonable person test" that a reasonable person would assume the person he was messaging was "of age", of course, that's grey area in the court of public opinion... but Twitch sat on this info for a half-decade, they clearly didn't think anything of it when they suspended him years ago, and he dragged them through the legal courts while they had all this info.
If Twitch had any records of his wrongdoings, which took place on Twitch messaging, they'd bring them up when he sued them for defamation, no matter how minor (heh) tangentially related they may be.
Yes, I believe that is one of the earliest things we notice about the anointed liberal personality type even outside their silly political takes. To them virtue is nothing but clothing and a way to wash their sins through scapegoating.
so.. a 12 year old is old enough to change genders/sex, which means they have a concept of sex. but this old dude messaging and flirting a 17 year old is all of a sudden "oh no... minor". i know i said previously, that it is whatever unless he was grooming the individual. no way to tell what was this "flirting". if he said "you are a pretty, young girl". it can be seen as flirting or a complement.
ive seen enough To Catch A Predator to know its only illegal if they send dick picks or ask to meet up. lol.
He was investigated and found just as guilty as gamergate!
Which is to say: no charge, no filings, no record addendums.
If the reason behind this is a "reasonable person test" that a reasonable person would assume the person he was messaging was "of age", of course, that's grey area in the court of public opinion... but Twitch sat on this info for a half-decade, they clearly didn't think anything of it when they suspended him years ago, and he dragged them through the legal courts while they had all this info.
If Twitch had any records of his wrongdoings, which took place on Twitch messaging, they'd bring them up when he sued them for defamation, no matter how minor (heh) tangentially related they may be.
I think all these personalities and companies are going hard on this dr disrespect because they try to overcompensate to hide their own skeletons.
The feminist males that supports metoo are often rapists themselves.
Yes, I believe that is one of the earliest things we notice about the anointed liberal personality type even outside their silly political takes. To them virtue is nothing but clothing and a way to wash their sins through scapegoating.