I know meta-posts accomplish nothing, but I hope he'll be allowed to stay. He's a staple.
I don't agree with him, but he amuses me and, as said, he's a staple. And he often gets banned for bullshit reasons. I think last time he was banned for simply saying "worse halves."
That really shouldn't be considered an "identify attack" or whatever. Then again, nothing should.
Like, seriously, how gay is that? (Answer: Super-duper gay. Like, mega-homosexual.)
Dom, stop banning Imp. He's great. Again, I don't agree with him generally, but he really livens up the place.
Likewise, stop banning gopower, now that you finally caught on that he's actually a hilarious troll. He's the only actually funny troll we have.
I think hes banned not because he dislikes women. He is banned for derailing every thread by making it about disliking women.
Question is, though...is that against the rules?
I've had my disagreements with Imp, for sure.
But R16 says "Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring," (hah, gaaaaaay!), not "Don't derail threads."
In fairness, Imp doesn't think that women are inferior. He thinks they are literally evil.
That the base, most essential nature of women will cause them to selfishly drive society towards decadence, decline and eventual implosion.
After the last century or so of women's gradual liberation in action... is he wrong? From observation, it would seem that the natural inclinations of the majority of women are simply incompatible with a stable and prosperous civilization. To be fair I also think most people are easily programmable NPCs who shouldn't be trusted to decide what color to paint their house much less governmental policy, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt.
Women can be taught to take accountability, to self-reflect on their internal (emotional) state and to not think with their feelings. It just takes enormous social pressure to do this.
Feminism has been fantastically successful at removing all responsibility and accountability from women, while increasing the accountability and responsibility for men.
Society of the past has recognized that women are infantile and selfish and has demanded that men take care of them accordingly, in return women birth and care for the next generation. Now that social contract is irredeemably broken and it will lead directly to the end of entire cultures (Korea, Italy, Japan, etc) in the near future. The situation will be irreversible (even with breeding camps) in about 20 years.
This has been a textbook example of Tragedy of the Commons. The selfish desires of women have literally doomed entire cultures.
Things are going to get very much worse before women decide to let men make changes. Cultures that do not empower women's choices will become dominant specifically because they do not empower women's choices.
So, no. He isn't wrong.