Legal Bros: does this seem like a proper use of "standing", or is it bullshit?
(www.zerohedge.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
It's particularly egregious here; they've created an impenetrable shield around government censorship:
1 - You can't sue the government because you haven't proved that they censored anyone. First you have to sue the third parties who did the censoring.
2 - You can't sue a third party for censorship because it's not illegal for the third party to censor.
3 - You can't sue anybody.