The founding fathers would not have supported either policing or long prisons as institutions, but would have instead relied on a militia system and corporal punishment.
However, those things are not the current law. Dialectic is correct. Pennsylvania v. Mimms applies here.
Which brings up the notion of "Might is right!" and everyone seems to like that one.
I think not being aggressive is the key in moving forward. A tattooed person pointing a gun at me will never have me comply, regardless of the uniform they are wearing which I'm meant to be scared of, and anyone suggesting so should experience it first-hand so that they can agree with me (Should they need to).
Everyone will all calm down eventually, well, whoever is left of them.
I love you man but you know that's just you supporting tyranny.
And no, I'm not going the whole Israel thing with you and feel your pain trying to walk that tightrope.
The founding fathers would not have supported either policing or long prisons as institutions, but would have instead relied on a militia system and corporal punishment.
However, those things are not the current law. Dialectic is correct. Pennsylvania v. Mimms applies here.
When did British law get binned?
That's my argument.
Your concept of British Law was already binned by the British much more aggressively.
Which brings up the notion of "Might is right!" and everyone seems to like that one.
I think not being aggressive is the key in moving forward. A tattooed person pointing a gun at me will never have me comply, regardless of the uniform they are wearing which I'm meant to be scared of, and anyone suggesting so should experience it first-hand so that they can agree with me (Should they need to).
Everyone will all calm down eventually, well, whoever is left of them.