Well you're going to be in a world of hurt then because officers have authority to detain you and if you don't comply it'll get bad for you very fast. Doesn't matter if you don't like it
The founding fathers would not have supported either policing or long prisons as institutions, but would have instead relied on a militia system and corporal punishment.
However, those things are not the current law. Dialectic is correct. Pennsylvania v. Mimms applies here.
Well you're going to be in a world of hurt then because officers have authority to detain you and if you don't comply it'll get bad for you very fast. Doesn't matter if you don't like it
You mean arrest?
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Fedposting
The founding fathers would not have supported either policing or long prisons as institutions, but would have instead relied on a militia system and corporal punishment.
However, those things are not the current law. Dialectic is correct. Pennsylvania v. Mimms applies here.