The founding fathers would not have supported either policing or long prisons as institutions, but would have instead relied on a militia system and corporal punishment.
However, those things are not the current law. Dialectic is correct. Pennsylvania v. Mimms applies here.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Fedposting
I love you man but you know that's just you supporting tyranny.
And no, I'm not going the whole Israel thing with you and feel your pain trying to walk that tightrope.
The founding fathers would not have supported either policing or long prisons as institutions, but would have instead relied on a militia system and corporal punishment.
However, those things are not the current law. Dialectic is correct. Pennsylvania v. Mimms applies here.
When did British law get binned?
That's my argument.
Your concept of British Law was already binned by the British much more aggressively.