Did you ever hear of “advanced” women clamouring for equality in the matter of military service or even for the right to become police constables? One often hears the Feminists’ wail over the economic inequality between men and women. They claim, and justly claim, equal wages for equal work, no preference to men over women. With this we are all agreed. But have you ever heard of a Feminist demanding equal penalty for equal crime? Because I never have.

From the link above.

No. You will never hear them claim shares of jobs as Garbagemen or day laborers. You will not hear them shout that laws must be enforced evenly. Instead, they will affirm the pussy pass and beg light treatment on behalf of women, for women's sake. Rights, with no corresponding responsibilities; to still have their cake even after devouring it, whole.

To whit the above link's conclusion:

The conclusion I draw from the above facts alone, and apart from all other considerations, such as those previously indicated, is, that setting aside the question of the intrinsic suitability or unsuitability of the female sex for the exercise of political functions it is at least not just or equitable that women should exercise such functions – even the suffrage – (1) So long as women possess sex privileges as against men, or so long as they are not prepared to accept the whole duties and responsibilities of life in an equal degree with men; (2) That it is undesirable they should be given the franchise at all so long as the acquirement of the vote by women would possibly mean the political subjection of man, owing to the excess of the female population. I contend that so long as women have special privileges at criminal law, special favouritism at civil law, special exemption from military service, the right of maintenance, when married, by the husband, &c., it is neither just nor expedient that they should, in addition, by the concession of the franchise, be placed in a position to dominate men politically by sheer weight of numbers.

Enter Family Courts and no fault divorce, as a point (3) where men may be drafted by the state into the maintenance of women and children treated as theirs whom they did not sire. If you extend this to the welfare state, the taxation mechanisms themselves compel analogous supports.

TheImp may be monomaniacal in his pursuit of and fixation on this issue, but the rise of the Feminist sisterhood and its consequences have been a disaster for Western political culture.