Even for urinalists this is a hilariously shaky article. Valve has a "don't deliberately rip us off" clause in their agreement somewhere and this constitutes a monopoly?
Between The Guardian and the BBC being involved I'm thinking this entire thing is just a further proof of how people who buy and play games are being misrepresented by those wanting power and control via illicit means.
I mean, if the largest distributor is even vaguely independent then that's a problem for "them".
The EU for example have long ago declared that they think they have the right to censor the entire Internet under the premise that their citizens might see it. Why wouldn't the corrupt eurocrats try to strongarm steam?
I'd wager there's several more attempts in the future.
We're already murders, rapists, racists and all sorts of other things apparently.
Why not just all-out remove the drip and make sure that it comes from an approved Big Pharma that pays dividends to the politicians looking after their peons all so well?
I'd point out that your complaint against the upfront fee clashes with the complaint against scams. The fee was implemented to try and dissuade fly by night assholes doing that.
Now what they ought to implement is a monetary floor for giving reviews.
Even for urinalists this is a hilariously shaky article. Valve has a "don't deliberately rip us off" clause in their agreement somewhere and this constitutes a monopoly?
Between The Guardian and the BBC being involved I'm thinking this entire thing is just a further proof of how people who buy and play games are being misrepresented by those wanting power and control via illicit means.
I mean, if the largest distributor is even vaguely independent then that's a problem for "them".
The EU for example have long ago declared that they think they have the right to censor the entire Internet under the premise that their citizens might see it. Why wouldn't the corrupt eurocrats try to strongarm steam?
I'd wager there's several more attempts in the future.
We're already murders, rapists, racists and all sorts of other things apparently.
Why not just all-out remove the drip and make sure that it comes from an approved Big Pharma that pays dividends to the politicians looking after their peons all so well?
Like what?
I'd point out that your complaint against the upfront fee clashes with the complaint against scams. The fee was implemented to try and dissuade fly by night assholes doing that.
Now what they ought to implement is a monetary floor for giving reviews.
"urinalists"
stop doing that. it makes you sound like a child.
Nah.