With friends like Lady Lindsey we don't need enemies
(archive.is)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Oh, I'm aware. I just think it's stupid.
Also, I'm against "enhancers" in general. Charge the crime, not the thought or other aspect.
Drunk driver? Get fucked. Passenger with an open lite beer? Don't care.
"Hate crime?" Nope, don't care. Beat a dude? Charge that shit. Said mean shit while beating dude? Irrelevant. Charge. The. Crime.
"Terrorist?" Nope, don't even care. Detonated a bomb? Yeah, that's probably mass murder, fuck you.
Various gun possession crimes? Don't care. Shoot someone for a non-justifiable reason, yeah, get fucked.
And, no, you shouldn't be able to be fined for not wearing a seatbelt, either.
Charge crimes that hurt people. That's it.
I assume that one is more of a logistical thing, because otherwise you could drive while drinking and then pass the beer to the guy sitting next to you if you get pulled over.
I thought that's what a breathalyzer is for?
Yes, but what I'm saying is that you could be temporarily below the 0.08 limit and heading above it by continuing to consume alcohol while you drive. I think that would avoid the breathalyzer, but is still a dangerous behavior that shouldn't be allowed.