I love that your counterargument to "I don't fucking care if you can't make a living as an author" is to explain why you can't make a living as an author, and to fail at it anyway.
So I'll repeat.
I don't fucking care. Laws written "so that creative people can get paid for writing books" aren't legitimate legal theory.
I love this part:
"but it is also true that I am not obligated to perform labor no one pays for—and that, in many cases, even if I want to, I cannot afford to." So fucking don't you retard.
I'm not bitching about personal problems. That's not a personal issue for me. The "I" was hypothetical, not literal. I'm warning you about the consequences of your policies. You're just a moron who doesn't understand incentives.
I love that your counterargument to "I don't fucking care if you can't make a living as an author" is to explain why you can't make a living as an author, and to fail at it anyway.
So I'll repeat.
I don't fucking care. Laws written "so that creative people can get paid for writing books" aren't legitimate legal theory.
I love this part: "but it is also true that I am not obligated to perform labor no one pays for—and that, in many cases, even if I want to, I cannot afford to." So fucking don't you retard.
I'm not bitching about personal problems. That's not a personal issue for me. The "I" was hypothetical, not literal. I'm warning you about the consequences of your policies. You're just a moron who doesn't understand incentives.
You're borderline illiterate at this point. The "you" matches your hypothetical. It's called Subject verb agreement.
Even if I did mean "you personally" your response wouldn't be relevant, because again, I'm not arguing that they would or would not be encouraged.
I'm saying I don't care.
Again.
God you're stupid.