Another Day, Another single mom killing her kids
(archive.is)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
“Resolved” is a fun way of saying the court likely drained the father of all resources and forced him to quit trying to save his daughter.
Let's not pretend that a lot of fathers don't pump and dump women and take no responsibility for their children as the deadbeats that they are.
A lot of fathers don't, that implies a majority, there’s only one demographic in which that is the case. Men are stripped of their families by default and have to fight near impossible odds to even get shared custody. The system is designed against men from the get go, and was done so intentionally.
It doesn't imply a majority, but yeah, that one demographic is worse on this score.
I know it's orthodoxy here, and I believe there's a core of truth to it, but is that really true? Folks defending the system claim that most men don't even ask for custody, and that this explains a large part of this. What do you say to that?
This one is easily debunked, they are describing current numbers after the dust has settled so to speak. When you look at the rates since the adoption of no fault divorce it’s like a cliff drop in the past 20 years because any family lawyer will even tell you it’s an absurdly expensive process and you are at the complete whim of judges whose track records speak for themselves. The system created the no contests because it’s financially impossible for the 80% to win. This extends so far that even men who want to take their own children off the adoption list after their mother released them to the state will have to pay thousands in legal fees and court costs to do so.