I appreciate you finally answering this guy at least.
u/Quickname There's no exhaustive list. Perhaps there is no list. I assume you mean to point out that the fact he's going to arbitrarily alter the list as he deems warranted as a gotcha, but that's an obvious fact. Moderation is inherently arbitrary. He has a mental heuristic that matches his intent behind the rules and decides on allowed/disallowed slurs in the moment. To be clear, I don't agree with all of his decisions either and think making a list is a good idea.
Why do you have to manage it? It’s a short list, and it shouldn’t change. You’ve already established that faggot, nigger, and retard are not actionable; how long can it be?
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
This would be the glorification part of Rule 2. It is quintessential glow-posting.
Hey Dom, why haven’t you responded to any of my comments?
You can't have too much to think, even here.
Because if I add a list, then I also have to figure out how to manage it.
I appreciate you finally answering this guy at least.
u/Quickname There's no exhaustive list. Perhaps there is no list. I assume you mean to point out that the fact he's going to arbitrarily alter the list as he deems warranted as a gotcha, but that's an obvious fact. Moderation is inherently arbitrary. He has a mental heuristic that matches his intent behind the rules and decides on allowed/disallowed slurs in the moment. To be clear, I don't agree with all of his decisions either and think making a list is a good idea.
Why do you have to manage it? It’s a short list, and it shouldn’t change. You’ve already established that faggot, nigger, and retard are not actionable; how long can it be?