Nepotism isn't really good or bad in itself. The tradeoff being made is always about competence vs. commitment to a core vision. Someone who is hired for nepotistic reasons may have more real, organic reason to support a certain vision than someone who isn't in your in-group, but is 5% more effective.
All things lead to decay, because entropy.
Nepotism isn't really good or bad in itself. The tradeoff being made is always about competence vs. commitment to a core vision. Someone who is hired for nepotistic reasons may have more real, organic reason to support a certain vision than someone who isn't in your in-group, but is 5% more effective.