Yup. Even worse yet are the amount of people who seem okay with "mandatory patches".
I can't even count the amount of people I have come across who say, "Yeah, but newer games are better because they can just patch it and fix it, old games you couldn't patch them!"
To those people, I always inform them, "Yes, back in the day if you launched a game broken and unplayable day-one, it usually meant the end of your company because you actually had to release a properly working game on day-one back in the day in order to be successful."
mandatory patches aren't the problem. mandatory patches help keep shit consistent, a much lower cost of support. no business in their right mind wants to manage all that shit.
the problem is DEI faggots abusing mandatory patches to put a chick in it and make her gay and lame.
Truly a fantastic example of tripping at the finish line.
Also a fantastic reason in the long list of why "mandatory patches" is an undertalked about problem in the gaming industry.
Yup. Even worse yet are the amount of people who seem okay with "mandatory patches".
I can't even count the amount of people I have come across who say, "Yeah, but newer games are better because they can just patch it and fix it, old games you couldn't patch them!"
To those people, I always inform them, "Yes, back in the day if you launched a game broken and unplayable day-one, it usually meant the end of your company because you actually had to release a properly working game on day-one back in the day in order to be successful."
mandatory patches aren't the problem. mandatory patches help keep shit consistent, a much lower cost of support. no business in their right mind wants to manage all that shit.
the problem is DEI faggots abusing mandatory patches to put a chick in it and make her gay and lame.