Welp, since the last post on the subject got deleted I'll say it again.
The West was great long before women's suffrage, from 1760 onwards really. That the greatness managed to limp along for the last century before crumbling is agnostic or in spite of women voting.
Gotta love the myopia that if you start to doubt the propaganda about girlbosses you've suddenly converted to Islam. You can still hate their pedo-praising cousin-lovin goatfucker culture even if you stop fetishizing women.
That's the problem with appealing to conservatism in only the most literal sense, why should we conserve feminism in it's current metastasized state as a tradition? Just because it currently exists? Why is that seen as a loss rather than preserving the traditions of the 19th century that saw the west on a meteoric rise instead of a slow disintegration?
Welp, since the last post on the subject got deleted I'll say it again.
Was OP a faggot? I saw a bit of that this morning. Did he get too many downboats, or what?
The West was great long before women's suffrage...the greatness managed to limp along for the last century before crumbling is agnostic or in spite of women voting.
It really is amazing. I'm far from the most based or redpilled on the issue admittedly, but it's insane how they ignore all the time women didn't have power, and then try to act like the brief fucking instance where they did have power but things hadn't gone to complete and utter shit yet, proves that we need women in positions of power.
No, fuck off. If anything, history clearly shows we don't need women in positions of power.
It was upvoted. Just that someone suggested since the two posts were the same lolcow on the same twitter thread I should just post one so I deleted the earlier one
Let’s think about the fact that it was maybe 10-20 mins apart and about the same subject. The latter topic has 60 upvotes , but you believe the first is so radically different it will get negative votes instead?
Welp, since the last post on the subject got deleted I'll say it again.
The West was great long before women's suffrage, from 1760 onwards really. That the greatness managed to limp along for the last century before crumbling is agnostic or in spite of women voting.
Gotta love the myopia that if you start to doubt the propaganda about girlbosses you've suddenly converted to Islam. You can still hate their pedo-praising cousin-lovin goatfucker culture even if you stop fetishizing women.
That's the problem with appealing to conservatism in only the most literal sense, why should we conserve feminism in it's current metastasized state as a tradition? Just because it currently exists? Why is that seen as a loss rather than preserving the traditions of the 19th century that saw the west on a meteoric rise instead of a slow disintegration?
Was OP a faggot? I saw a bit of that this morning. Did he get too many downboats, or what?
It really is amazing. I'm far from the most based or redpilled on the issue admittedly, but it's insane how they ignore all the time women didn't have power, and then try to act like the brief fucking instance where they did have power but things hadn't gone to complete and utter shit yet, proves that we need women in positions of power.
No, fuck off. If anything, history clearly shows we don't need women in positions of power.
It was upvoted. Just that someone suggested since the two posts were the same lolcow on the same twitter thread I should just post one so I deleted the earlier one
It was like +5/+4, lol.
You reset and tried again. And you downvote people who criticize you. Reddit-tier behavior.
So is that +5/-4 an upvoted thread or a downvoted one?
Here’s the post asking me to consolidate it instead of posting 2 so I did
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17t1W198V8/x/c/4ZBI1MKIONE
Let’s think about the fact that it was maybe 10-20 mins apart and about the same subject. The latter topic has 60 upvotes , but you believe the first is so radically different it will get negative votes instead?
Dude the problem is you