A game changing graffiti in a game has nothing to do with freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is freedom from government persecution
Oh, you're one of those retards that doesn't understand the difference between the First Amendment and Freedom of Speech.
Let me give you a little walkthrough: The Amendments are there to PROTECT human rights, not grant them, and through this, this is how individuals can in fact deny another person their human rights. Is slavery a-ok so long as it's done by private entities? No? So why is the denial of free speech any different when done by private actors?
You're awfully determined to stand firm on "this game needs to change to protect the feelings of a very, very small minority group". It's almost impressive how stubborn you hold onto this if it weren't entirely the product of falsely being told from a young age that such a stance is noble.
Delicate sensibilities are meaningless. Stop defending censorship just because you find it irrelevant. If you need a logical fallacy term, it's the fallacy of relative privation. Just because there are worse forms of censorship doesn't negate that this is still censorship too.
Oh, you're one of those retards that doesn't understand the difference between the First Amendment and Freedom of Speech.
Let me give you a little walkthrough: The Amendments are there to PROTECT human rights, not grant them, and through this, this is how individuals can in fact deny another person their human rights. Is slavery a-ok so long as it's done by private entities? No? So why is the denial of free speech any different when done by private actors?
You're awfully determined to stand firm on "this game needs to change to protect the feelings of a very, very small minority group". It's almost impressive how stubborn you hold onto this if it weren't entirely the product of falsely being told from a young age that such a stance is noble.
Delicate sensibilities are meaningless. Stop defending censorship just because you find it irrelevant. If you need a logical fallacy term, it's the fallacy of relative privation. Just because there are worse forms of censorship doesn't negate that this is still censorship too.
Because it's not violating any human rights. It's a MASSIVE difference from slavery.
Freedom of speech is a human right. That you cannot understand that says a lot about what kind of person you are.