I wonder why Little Benny doesn't want people questioning ww2 (This is a New York Times article from 1941)
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Check out the Balfour Declaration; I know that's WW1, but it shows how such conspiracy theories aren't so out there.
Even Wikipedia reads at least in part like antisemitic propaganda.
The Zionist Jews were openly talking about positioning various countries to serve their interests in the world war, and that's just one of many examples. Oh, and it was a literal Rothschild op. I believe they'd earlier promised they could get America into the war to begin with.
You can also check out the article by Churchill called Zionism vs. Bolshevism with quotes like:
"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing."
I know it's far from the primary point but, I'm sorry, that will never not crack me up.
There's comedy bits about how you should never put "the" and "Jews" together. "Jewess" just takes it up a notch. Makes me sort of chortle every time I see it. Anyone who unironically calls someone a Jewess is either extremely based or an absolute retard. There's pretty much no middle ground.
On a more serious note, that is interesting stuff. It really is interesting how overrepresented they are in all that stuff and how, more interesting yet, back in the day, everyone knew it. You were still allowed to talk about it at the time.
And, to be clear, I'm not even blaming all Jews (#NotAllJews) or anything. There is some guilt to be spread around, and there are some troubling things in the ideology that does seem near universal, but you could see, especially back then before they subsumed a lot of the Jewish identity, that it really was a matter of Zionism. It was specifically the Zionist Jews who were doing the subverting, and they were even the ones using their fellow Jews.
It's kind of ironic that it was the Zionists who really conflated Zionism with Judaism, and then try to say you're antisemitic if you're against their evil Zionist agenda. No, you're the ones saying you represent Jews.