One of the most tiresome strawmen of "conspiracy theories" is that it requires everyone involved to be a perfect Machiavellian mastermind with absolute control over everything.

As if powerful institutions never lie, cover up atrocities from the public, assassinate inconvenient people, etc. Nevermind that only a rank amateur thinks that consent manufacturing is done by meticulously controlling every single interaction at the most granular level, which even North Korea can't do.

The fact that you poison the well against your notion of a "conspiracy theory" by reasoning a priori that conspiracies only work when they're perfectly airtight, even as you yourself admit that if indisputable proof of 9/11 being an inside job ever came to light there isn't jack shit that ordinary people could do about it, shows that you're every bit as close-minded and driven by an ax to grind as the people you hate.

You don't need to perfectly micromanage the flow of information when most people (at least until recently) don't bother to look up easily verifiable information that contradictions MSM narratives. How many retards believe that it's a totally normal everyday occurrence for cops to shoot unarmed, nonviolent black people, because they never bothered to read some fucking stats?

It's easy enough to fool people by poisoning the well against dissenters, since people such as yourself have already decided a priori that conspiracies are impossible according to a ridiculous standard of evidence. And if you had grown up in a country like Russia, you'd be calling anyone who raises an eyebrow against Russian dissidents mysteriously falling out of windows a conspiracy theorist, because the term is just a way to make anyone wanting to feel like a respectable, educated person so terrified of being associated with tinfoil crazies that they shut up and operate within the Overton Window.