Am I biased, or is there far more evidence in favor of "Bush did 9/11" than "we never landed on the moon?" That seems like one of the typical well-poisoning conspiracies to make everything tangential to it look bad.
I think the most accurate statement is, "Bush was complicit in 9/11". It was, IMO, almost certainly orchestrated by the alphabet agencies who consider themselves to be above the law.
Am I biased, or is there far more evidence in favor of "Bush did 9/11" than "we never landed on the moon?" That seems like one of the typical well-poisoning conspiracies to make everything tangential to it look bad.
I think the most accurate statement is, "Bush was complicit in 9/11". It was, IMO, almost certainly orchestrated by the alphabet agencies who consider themselves to be above the law.