I remember that the military respond to the containment breach (which happens because the one guy gets infected from his wife who is a carrier) by forcing everyone out of their apartments and into one big room where, IIRC, they also then turn the lights off for some reason. Naturally, that big room gets attacked and since everyone is confined into it, the rage virus spreads like wild. It was some of the dumbest shit I've ever seen in a movie trying to be serious.
Yeah especially when THEY HAVE SNIPERS ON THE ROOFTOPS!
You have them barricade in their apartments as they sweep floor to floor, the snipers can kill any infected that manage to break through to the apartments.
Or leaving the carrier unguarded so her partner can just come in and get infected.
What's so funny about this and really suspends the belief for me when it comes to 'zombie apocalypses' is this piss poor storytelling is littered throughout almost every zombie film/show ever and lots of people criticise it. At least come up with something plausible.
In fact, I could write a better setup for the military falling in the world than any of these retards. Here's one for you, biological warfare, the military actually get hit first by a planned attack. It spills out of control and because there aren't enough uninfected military out there so they have to retreat leaving the civilians to fend for themselves. They then start acting like roaming independent bandit groups rather than an actual military and have gone completely AWOL due to the breakdown of society.
Oh look I just fixed every zombie apocalypse movie ever and established the plot properly. This is why I appreciate the storyline of the flood even more because it's a microscopic virus that's fully capable of overpowering even the Covenant and that's genuinely scary shit as opposed to these ridiculous and poorly explained storylines they keep shoving down everyone's throats. It's also more interesting depending on the type of virus it is like with the last of us to not have typical 'undead' scenario because it brings along an excuse to introduce multiple types.
Also, I hate the idea of pregnant women being anywhere near an action movie and it's obvious these feminists even the women have never seen a pregnant woman RL. Have you ever seen a pregnant woman? They waddle, they can barely move because they've got a growing human being inside of them, so the idea that they're off travelling or fighting like it's nothing is particularly retarded even by the standards of the left. They're just straight up biology deniers.
I know right, the amount of women who would die during pregnancy and childbirth, along with infant mortality, would go back up to 1800s levels without basic medical care. The odds of a pregnant woman surviving the apocalypse and then surviving birth would be pretty low. I also think about half of all children used to die before age 5, so back to survival of the fittest.
I really lost interest after 28 weeks, there were too many dumb decisions to just cause action scenes to happen that it threw me out of it.
28 days was a lot better since the decisions actually made sense and were believable.
I remember that the military respond to the containment breach (which happens because the one guy gets infected from his wife who is a carrier) by forcing everyone out of their apartments and into one big room where, IIRC, they also then turn the lights off for some reason. Naturally, that big room gets attacked and since everyone is confined into it, the rage virus spreads like wild. It was some of the dumbest shit I've ever seen in a movie trying to be serious.
Yeah especially when THEY HAVE SNIPERS ON THE ROOFTOPS!
You have them barricade in their apartments as they sweep floor to floor, the snipers can kill any infected that manage to break through to the apartments.
Or leaving the carrier unguarded so her partner can just come in and get infected.
What's so funny about this and really suspends the belief for me when it comes to 'zombie apocalypses' is this piss poor storytelling is littered throughout almost every zombie film/show ever and lots of people criticise it. At least come up with something plausible.
In fact, I could write a better setup for the military falling in the world than any of these retards. Here's one for you, biological warfare, the military actually get hit first by a planned attack. It spills out of control and because there aren't enough uninfected military out there so they have to retreat leaving the civilians to fend for themselves. They then start acting like roaming independent bandit groups rather than an actual military and have gone completely AWOL due to the breakdown of society.
Oh look I just fixed every zombie apocalypse movie ever and established the plot properly. This is why I appreciate the storyline of the flood even more because it's a microscopic virus that's fully capable of overpowering even the Covenant and that's genuinely scary shit as opposed to these ridiculous and poorly explained storylines they keep shoving down everyone's throats. It's also more interesting depending on the type of virus it is like with the last of us to not have typical 'undead' scenario because it brings along an excuse to introduce multiple types.
Also, I hate the idea of pregnant women being anywhere near an action movie and it's obvious these feminists even the women have never seen a pregnant woman RL. Have you ever seen a pregnant woman? They waddle, they can barely move because they've got a growing human being inside of them, so the idea that they're off travelling or fighting like it's nothing is particularly retarded even by the standards of the left. They're just straight up biology deniers.
I know right, the amount of women who would die during pregnancy and childbirth, along with infant mortality, would go back up to 1800s levels without basic medical care. The odds of a pregnant woman surviving the apocalypse and then surviving birth would be pretty low. I also think about half of all children used to die before age 5, so back to survival of the fittest.