I've never been one to really care about the Jews, plight of the Jews, arguing about the Jews, etc. Still you make a fool of yourself in anything to take the story of one side as the whole truth and totally dismiss any alternate accounts. The truth is always elsewhere. Even if something as crazy as 95% of the Jewish account of the holocaust is true, that means 5% is not.
I do find the comment a bit dumb to imply that a country at war should not have cut off supply lines of the country they were trying to defeat. I'll take that over a modern pussified forever war. Aggressively win or go home.
I wouldn't say that's necessarily the implication they are trying to make. Moreso they seem to be clapping back at someone trotting out the "my grandfather liberated the camps and saw the horrors" shtick. I think it's perfectly reasonable to point out if a significant portion of that is due to logistic failures caused by war.
UK killed 750 000 dogs and cats to prepare for WW2 due to possible country-wide food shortages (and that was still at the very beginning of the war, when all infrastructures were perfectly ok).
If a country is attacked from 2 opposite sides by the 2 other biggest military power in the world (both with an army size far above yours), and suffered constant bombing, local revolutions, and other small operations all over your territory to cut resources, wouldn't you expect some logistical issues too? Even the tiny war (in comparison) between Ukraine and Russia right now has impacted logistics on a multi-national level. Remember the logistic nightmare that was at the end Afghanistan war by Biden, where all countries where in panic mode to retrieve their soldiers and equipment?
I've never been one to really care about the Jews, plight of the Jews, arguing about the Jews, etc. Still you make a fool of yourself in anything to take the story of one side as the whole truth and totally dismiss any alternate accounts. The truth is always elsewhere. Even if something as crazy as 95% of the Jewish account of the holocaust is true, that means 5% is not.
I do find the comment a bit dumb to imply that a country at war should not have cut off supply lines of the country they were trying to defeat. I'll take that over a modern pussified forever war. Aggressively win or go home.
I wouldn't say that's necessarily the implication they are trying to make. Moreso they seem to be clapping back at someone trotting out the "my grandfather liberated the camps and saw the horrors" shtick. I think it's perfectly reasonable to point out if a significant portion of that is due to logistic failures caused by war.
Sure..blame a systematic ethnic cleansing of Jewish people on "logistical failures". Anything else that needs to be added Adolph?
UK killed 750 000 dogs and cats to prepare for WW2 due to possible country-wide food shortages (and that was still at the very beginning of the war, when all infrastructures were perfectly ok).
If a country is attacked from 2 opposite sides by the 2 other biggest military power in the world (both with an army size far above yours), and suffered constant bombing, local revolutions, and other small operations all over your territory to cut resources, wouldn't you expect some logistical issues too? Even the tiny war (in comparison) between Ukraine and Russia right now has impacted logistics on a multi-national level. Remember the logistic nightmare that was at the end Afghanistan war by Biden, where all countries where in panic mode to retrieve their soldiers and equipment?