I made a post about this a long time ago... in 2017 on the old yahoo answer messaging board. despite whatever answer you thought i gave the covenant great answer award thingy to will shock you! but that's neither here nor there. what i will like to go over is white privilege.
Don't worry. i won't be using the lefts definition of white privilege. where every white person has an innate advantage over a non-white person. but instead i will use the general idea of a white person receiving an advantage for being white. what i want to know is what many of you guys think about it.
Now i know the usual suspects. i can see the troll comments rolling in, calling me a nigger. or 80% of the comments saying white privilege doesn't exist. and the other 20% saying it does exist but white people deserve it in their own country. but me raising this question is for 2 reasons. ya know, just to keep it simple. if you think white privilege doesn't exist. tell me why you don't think so, while also believing non-whites have an inherent advantage over whites. 2nd if you do believe in white privilege, and think it's ok for white people to have an advantage over non-whites. then how do you support meritocracy, if people who match your race will gain an unearned advantage?
But for me. i can equally acknowledge that if a white person does receive privilege by race. that, that doesn't mean, that they are immune from racism from self hating white people. and other racial minorities. sadly, many people both within, and even outside of this site. cannot hold this duality. and it's either 1 or the other, for many people to believe in.
I hate it when people try to be edgy via race. listen man race and ideas are 2 separate things. you can sharpen your racial teeth all you want. but someone within your race who disagrees with you on 1 premise is all it takes. then where is your racial unity then?
Also who gives a fuck! what some dude called robin diangelos says? i don't like racism, so i just don't do it. the only rigged games i see here. aren't from people who aren't racist, but from people who are. remember, black people didn't have the right vote at one point. so do i blame the non-racist for that? or the racists?
You blame the ones who brought them over to begin with, which is the topic of some debate. I'm of the mind that they shouldn't be here at all.
I'm not some "HUEHUEHUE SLAVE OWNERSHIP GOOOOD!" chungus either. Personally, I'd rather blacks self-govern in their own personal Wakanda or another few Jamaicas. I'm one of the rare people who will say that their racial homogeny should exist within its own partition even if that means lavishly funding them (with the money of immigration lobbyists)
Robin DiAngelo is one of yours, and a central figure in cultivating the idea of "white privilege".
You will always be racist, no matter what you do (wittle it down and you'll see that it is all about your adjacency to the other races) - and they will scrub you out of the historybooks no matter how moderate or "with it" you are right now.
You can greet them with a smile and maybe they'll greet you with their best, all very nice, but demographics illustrate a trojan horse of their worst; while you as a demographic are told to be benign and to ignore your rising crime statistics as rape and murder skyrockets because it's mean to have pattern recognition, they are told that you owe them something while on an very intimate level it's already very much "us versus them". They will always see any subsequent issue as a racial issue, which is to say a caste issue that is spawned by multiculturalism; introduce marxism and it exacerbates killing the other/higher caste through any means necessary. Lie, cheat, steal. But hey atleast you know some of the good ones!
It is eat or be eaten, and a high trust society cannot exist within this context. You're better off rigging the game - which we are not and that's a problem.
They can disagree, it can be fought and wrested - I'd rather an alikeness be there than have the fetters of racial identity politics weighing down any subsequent disagreement. I don't want to make whites out of blacks or anyone else. Race and ideas are not as separate as you think (e.g. the jews). What it comes down to is "what context would favor me?", from ethnocultural scaffold to ethnocultural scaffold, it isn't the same.
Cool, so your pro race segregation... good to know. also that Robin DIangelo guys sounds like a dick. not one of my people.
Hahaha, you're alright kid. I'm not even going to correct you.
Maybe, but not entirely (lest we end up like the Rhodesians) - "segregation" implies an occupation, or governance above said people, or that we'd even live in the same system for any such discrimination to occur.
Back. i don't understand the last part. segregation implies many things. what i'm saying is race segregation is bad. especially in any position of government. now, if people wish to, in a social setting, want to racially segregate themselves, i won't stop them. but when racial segregation effects where i can, and can't go. and which laws are applied to me by way of race, then i now have an issue with racial segregation. segregation on its own is fine. like how one segregates themselves from their neighbors. but legal segregation, and segregation applied by race, are 2 separate things. again i'm not opposed to segregation as a concept. but 1 based on race or other unchangeable features, are things i'm against.