remember, black people didn't have the right vote at one point. so do i blame the non-racist for that? or the racists?
You blame the ones who brought them over to begin with, which is the topic of some debate. I'm of the mind that they shouldn't be here at all.
I'm not some "HUEHUEHUE SLAVE OWNERSHIP GOOOOD!" chungus either. Personally, I'd rather blacks self-govern in their own personal Wakanda or another few Jamaicas. I'm one of the rare people who will say that their racial homogeny should exist within its own partition even if that means lavishly funding them (with the money of immigration lobbyists)
Also who gives a fuck! what some dude called robin diangelos says? i don't like racism, so i just don't do it. the only rigged games i see here. aren't from people who aren't racist, but from people who are.
Robin DiAngelo is one of yours, and a central figure in cultivating the idea of "white privilege".
You will always be racist, no matter what you do (wittle it down and you'll see that it is all about your adjacency to the other races) - and they will scrub you out of the historybooks no matter how moderate or "with it" you are right now.
You can greet them with a smile and maybe they'll greet you with their best, all very nice, but demographics illustrate a trojan horse of their worst; while you as a demographic are told to be benign and to ignore your rising crime statistics as rape and murder skyrockets because it's mean to have pattern recognition, they are told that you owe them something while on an very intimate level it's already very much "us versus them". They will always see any subsequent issue as a racial issue, which is to say a caste issue that is spawned by multiculturalism; introduce marxism and it exacerbates killing the other/higher caste through any means necessary. Lie, cheat, steal. But hey atleast you know some of the good ones!
It is eat or be eaten, and a high trust society cannot exist within this context. You're better off rigging the game - which we are not and that's a problem.
I hate it when people try to be edgy via race. listen man race and ideas are 2 separate things. you can sharpen your racial teeth all you want. but someone within your race who disagrees with you on 1 premise is all it takes. then where is your racial unity then?
They can disagree, it can be fought and wrested - I'd rather an alikeness be there than have the fetters of racial identity politics weighing down any subsequent disagreement. I don't want to make whites out of blacks or anyone else. Race and ideas are not as separate as you think (e.g. the jews). What it comes down to is "what context would favor me?", from ethnocultural scaffold to ethnocultural scaffold, it isn't the same.
Hahaha, you're alright kid. I'm not even going to correct you.
Cool, so your pro race segregation...
Maybe, but not entirely (lest we end up like the Rhodesians) - "segregation" implies an occupation, or governance above said people, or that we'd even live in the same system for any such discrimination to occur.
The problem I see is this: they won't let us self-segregate. You can move to the middle of the fucking desert on some unincorporated plot of land where no one wants to be and they'll still find a way to flood it with "diversity", usually by filling the neighboring city council seats with blues - from there it's only a matter of time. I think legal boundaries of who is and who isn't a guest where is the only real way to go to actually live in a high trust society.
You blame the ones who brought them over to begin with, which is the topic of some debate. I'm of the mind that they shouldn't be here at all.
I'm not some "HUEHUEHUE SLAVE OWNERSHIP GOOOOD!" chungus either. Personally, I'd rather blacks self-govern in their own personal Wakanda or another few Jamaicas. I'm one of the rare people who will say that their racial homogeny should exist within its own partition even if that means lavishly funding them (with the money of immigration lobbyists)
Robin DiAngelo is one of yours, and a central figure in cultivating the idea of "white privilege".
You will always be racist, no matter what you do (wittle it down and you'll see that it is all about your adjacency to the other races) - and they will scrub you out of the historybooks no matter how moderate or "with it" you are right now.
You can greet them with a smile and maybe they'll greet you with their best, all very nice, but demographics illustrate a trojan horse of their worst; while you as a demographic are told to be benign and to ignore your rising crime statistics as rape and murder skyrockets because it's mean to have pattern recognition, they are told that you owe them something while on an very intimate level it's already very much "us versus them". They will always see any subsequent issue as a racial issue, which is to say a caste issue that is spawned by multiculturalism; introduce marxism and it exacerbates killing the other/higher caste through any means necessary. Lie, cheat, steal. But hey atleast you know some of the good ones!
It is eat or be eaten, and a high trust society cannot exist within this context. You're better off rigging the game - which we are not and that's a problem.
They can disagree, it can be fought and wrested - I'd rather an alikeness be there than have the fetters of racial identity politics weighing down any subsequent disagreement. I don't want to make whites out of blacks or anyone else. Race and ideas are not as separate as you think (e.g. the jews). What it comes down to is "what context would favor me?", from ethnocultural scaffold to ethnocultural scaffold, it isn't the same.
Hahaha, you're alright kid. I'm not even going to correct you.
Maybe, but not entirely (lest we end up like the Rhodesians) - "segregation" implies an occupation, or governance above said people, or that we'd even live in the same system for any such discrimination to occur.
The problem I see is this: they won't let us self-segregate. You can move to the middle of the fucking desert on some unincorporated plot of land where no one wants to be and they'll still find a way to flood it with "diversity", usually by filling the neighboring city council seats with blues - from there it's only a matter of time. I think legal boundaries of who is and who isn't a guest where is the only real way to go to actually live in a high trust society.