Remove White guilt and purge the Church of England to be representative of Christians
Purge the administrative state Argentina style
Make self defence laws more akin to Castle Doctrine
That is pretty much your future, the fact that the UK military can only last 2 WEEKS with a on peer country in a war shows how fucked the situation is.
Western Europe? all cucks and simps, they are done, the conquered will convert fast because for them peace is more important that saving their culture.
Mass conversion to Islam? I really don't see that. White grafting into Islam has never happened on an appreciable scale, even with the civil invasion the last 10 years. The religion is just too coercive and anti-intellectual when applied in earnest.
I think it's more likely the balkanization deepens to a sufficient degree to force a response from the government. For example, London or another city would become so Muslim that they assert local control over education and policing. Or maybe it'll be an entire region of the country. At that point, if the government is likewise infiltrated, there may be a formalized civil split. The right wing white faction may clamor to take back the area and kick the Muslims out of Europe again.
Peers as in technological peers. Like having access to the logistical capacity (military transports) and weapon technology.
I see your point, but it really sounds like a useless parity measure to me. does access matter if you can't sustain it for a conflict of any reasonable duration?
Put it this way, if the UK turned it's armed forces on the third worlders currently invading it, they more than likely win.
are you sure about this? as you say, half the army would instantly defect to the opposition. what fraction of the others would immediately become pregnant? then theres reserves, how many fighting age non military Brits would actually want to fight this? Not just in some abstract sense but go actually get shot at. For the country and the leaders who created the problem in the first place(among the fuckton of other nasty things).
you'd be in a worse position than Israel today, because no victim trump card, rampant demoralization and no infinite ammo.
I see your point, but it really sounds like a useless parity measure to me. does access matter if you can't sustain it for a conflict of any reasonable duration?
Yes because it determines your potential... you can always find a certain number of good soldiers immediately (even if very few) but it takes decades to build industry and tech.
are you sure about this? as you say, half the army would instantly defect to the opposition. what fraction of the others would immediately become pregnant? then theres reserves, how many fighting age non military Brits would actually want to fight this? Not just in some abstract sense but go actually get shot at. For the country and the leaders who created the problem in the first place(among the fuckton of other nasty things).
If the UK government suddenly got based enough to take action and kick out the refugees, there would be no shortage of competent white male volunteers. Authentic, strong leadership galvanizes men, even men that start out weak.
I mean unless the British:
Remove White guilt and purge the Church of England to be representative of Christians
Purge the administrative state Argentina style
Make self defence laws more akin to Castle Doctrine
That is pretty much your future, the fact that the UK military can only last 2 WEEKS with a on peer country in a war shows how fucked the situation is.
There's actual data on that. There was an old infograpgic floating around a decade ago I can't find, but it was formatted like
At X% of host country population, muslims do Y.
Their religion acts like a virus on a macro scale.
Mass conversion to Islam? I really don't see that. White grafting into Islam has never happened on an appreciable scale, even with the civil invasion the last 10 years. The religion is just too coercive and anti-intellectual when applied in earnest.
I think it's more likely the balkanization deepens to a sufficient degree to force a response from the government. For example, London or another city would become so Muslim that they assert local control over education and policing. Or maybe it'll be an entire region of the country. At that point, if the government is likewise infiltrated, there may be a formalized civil split. The right wing white faction may clamor to take back the area and kick the Muslims out of Europe again.
if they can rout your army in two weeks, they're not your "peers": you need to reassess your standing.
Peers as in technological peers. Like having access to the logistical capacity (military transports) and weapon technology.
Put it this way, if the UK turned it's armed forces on the third worlders currently invading it, they more than likely win.
If those same third world's are now at least half of the military because you persecuted Whites and so have access to same weapons, they're fucked.
I see your point, but it really sounds like a useless parity measure to me. does access matter if you can't sustain it for a conflict of any reasonable duration?
are you sure about this? as you say, half the army would instantly defect to the opposition. what fraction of the others would immediately become pregnant? then theres reserves, how many fighting age non military Brits would actually want to fight this? Not just in some abstract sense but go actually get shot at. For the country and the leaders who created the problem in the first place(among the fuckton of other nasty things).
you'd be in a worse position than Israel today, because no victim trump card, rampant demoralization and no infinite ammo.
Yes because it determines your potential... you can always find a certain number of good soldiers immediately (even if very few) but it takes decades to build industry and tech.
If the UK government suddenly got based enough to take action and kick out the refugees, there would be no shortage of competent white male volunteers. Authentic, strong leadership galvanizes men, even men that start out weak.