So I read the thing, it's even dumber than I thought.
To clean up the lengthy post I had here at first, I'll just sum up with this.
It's kind of misleading. Only sites where at least 10% of the its users are under 14 does this bill apply. Facebook and Twitter will probably be excluded due to the sheer amount of people over 14 that use it. Tik Tok and Snapchat though…
Beside the slightly inconvenient to this bill's entire purpose fact that you don't issue ID to people under 16 for a drivers license and 18/21 for most other things, it just begs the question, is this really for kids if the ones that are being impacted are already old enough for an ID?
So I read the thing, it's even dumber than I thought.
To clean up the lengthy post I had here at first, I'll just sum up with this.
It's kind of misleading. Only sites where at least 10% of the its users are under 14 does this bill apply. Facebook and Twitter will probably be excluded due to the sheer amount of people over 14 that use it. Tik Tok and Snapchat though…
Beside the slightly inconvenient to this bill's entire purpose fact that you don't issue ID to people under 16 for a drivers license and 18/21 for most other things, it just begs the question, is this really for kids if the ones that are being impacted are already old enough for an ID?
We already know the answer.