Pretend you have one hour to convince a random normie that the mainstream media is propaganda rather than a collection of well-meaning, objective journalists who sometimes get it wrong but overall try to deliver fair and accurate reporting.
If you fail, you die.
What's your approach?
It's a stupid hypothetical for several reasons but I'm very interested in this topic and I'm curious to hear your thoughts, so I'll ask for a pass on the overly dramatic scenario.
I'm guessing the most common response will be, "It won't work no matter what you do", and fwiw I think that's correct. But for the small group who can be reasoned with, what do you think is the optimal approach?
This is rich coming from you. you're a bi man, who wishes to restrict LGBTQ rights. because... reasons. you're also an atheist. who believes anything bad humans have done through out history... is atheists fault, the non-religious. and we need religion to fix all that because, reasons... you yourself are a walking contradiction.
Oh shut the fuck up you racist, mixbreed hating piece of shit. no different than the goddamn nazi's on this site.
I have to support grooming?
Your arguments are so weak that you have to resort to things you made up.
Who said that? i'm also bi, and don't like what the LGBTQ group is doing. but your aim is to strip rights. and rightfully put all gays back in the closet... ya asshole. and we had a talk about how you think all of the worlds current problem is caused by atheists. and by going back to religion being everywhere. it'll stop the wokeness because you said only the woke were atheist. while the non-woke were religious.
Name those 'rights'.
Oh, backtracking already? You said all the problems in world history.
marriage equality i believe. and how our current society couldn't survive the onslaught of pregnant men or whatever. when in the old days of religion, we barely survived that.