Pretend you have one hour to convince a random normie that the mainstream media is propaganda rather than a collection of well-meaning, objective journalists who sometimes get it wrong but overall try to deliver fair and accurate reporting.
If you fail, you die.
What's your approach?
It's a stupid hypothetical for several reasons but I'm very interested in this topic and I'm curious to hear your thoughts, so I'll ask for a pass on the overly dramatic scenario.
I'm guessing the most common response will be, "It won't work no matter what you do", and fwiw I think that's correct. But for the small group who can be reasoned with, what do you think is the optimal approach?
Those videos of various local news stations all repeating the same line is a good start. Then bring up the easily confirmed fact that only a handful of men own most of the MSM. After that, I'd bring up a few famous news stories that were based on lies and prove it, preferably ones that are sure to trigger the emotions of whoever im talking to. Finally, id bring up the ties various newscasters have to the cia and other government agencies
All good. up until you said.
Cool... but if you do that. they'll just move the goal post to the times the news didn't lie about high profile cases... putting you back at square one. also, what does only a handful of men owning the news have to do with anything? if you're dealing with a lefty not a normie. they'd wet their pants with soy. if you're dealing with a normie they might find that weird... but most will think nothing of it. you guys aren't very creative on convincing people. no wonder your alone.
Lol