While the sexual abuse verdict was “watertight”, the more serious offence requires evidence that the defendant knew their victim did not consent to sex.
Supreme Court judges ruled that the first court should have established whether the attacker thought his victim agreed to a sexual act and intended to act against the boy’s will.
What the fuck?? So Austria believes that ten year old children can consent to sex??
What the fuck?? So Austria believes that ten year old children can consent to sex??
What the actual fuck? These Supreme Court judges should be hung in the town square for that