Supreme Court of Canada ruled in a sexual assault case that it was “problematic” for a lower court judge to refer to the alleged victim as a “woman,” implying that the more appropriate term should have been “person with a vagina.” Nobody in the case was trans - Kotaku In Action 2

Supreme Court of Canada ruled in a sexual assault case that it was “problematic” for a lower court judge to refer to the alleged victim as a “woman,” implying that the more appropriate term should have been “person with a vagina.” Nobody in the case was trans (archive.is)

posted 284 days ago by YesMovement 284 days ago by YesMovement +66 / -0

21 comments

21 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (21)

sorted by:

▲ 21 ▼

– Hugs 21 points 284 days ago +21 / -0

So the Supreme Court of Canada wants us to talk about everyone else's genitals when we refer to them instead of something plain like man or woman?

This same Supreme Court's supposed to rule on the federal case Trudeau's government lost over the Emergencies Act invocation. I can see we've already lost that too.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– Careless_Ejaculator 7 points 284 days ago +7 / -0

I'm looking forward to calling people dick-owners and cunt-havers, myself.

permalink parent save report block reply