the ruling is not surprising, what is surprising is that it was a unanimous ruling. I never would have expected in a billion years that Sotomayor would have ruled in favor of Trump.
Only the part that states can't remove a candidate over "insurrection" was unanimous.
Amy Barrett thinks going beyond what states can do would make politics too hot (what a wuss).
Sotomayor, Kagan, Katanji say that the Federal Government can still remove Trump from ballots if it wants to without any new legislation (only states can't do it). Hoping that Merrick Garland will save them from the bad man.
They don’t want red state to start doing to same for a planted candidate (like Joe and Kamala.) They can hide behind state representation if they can ban it on a Federal level.
the ruling is not surprising, what is surprising is that it was a unanimous ruling. I never would have expected in a billion years that Sotomayor would have ruled in favor of Trump.
Only the part that states can't remove a candidate over "insurrection" was unanimous.
Amy Barrett thinks going beyond what states can do would make politics too hot (what a wuss).
Sotomayor, Kagan, Katanji say that the Federal Government can still remove Trump from ballots if it wants to without any new legislation (only states can't do it). Hoping that Merrick Garland will save them from the bad man.
They don’t want red state to start doing to same for a planted candidate (like Joe and Kamala.) They can hide behind state representation if they can ban it on a Federal level.