A few years ago, Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the fact that Québec didn't fully financially rape men to the benefit of a woman he was in a relationship with but not married to was ''discriminatory''.
... but that this discrimination was not in violation of charter rights.
How this went to the Supreme Court is a joke. They were not married. They had kids, but the man was already liable for, and paying, a fat child support check.
The bitch just wanted half of the man's ressources for herself.
I'll let you guess the ethnicity of the fat female lawyer who toured the media to whine this was mysoginy and that the government had to forcefully make a man who has sex with a woman forever financially responsible for her.
She kept saying ''but think of the children, think of the children''. The mom already got alot of child support from the father. The children were fine. Stop (((lying))).
A few years ago, Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the fact that Québec didn't fully financially rape men to the benefit of a woman he was in a relationship with but not married to was ''discriminatory''.
... but that this discrimination was not in violation of charter rights.
How this went to the Supreme Court is a joke. They were not married. They had kids, but the man was already liable for, and paying, a fat child support check.
The bitch just wanted half of the man's ressources for herself.
I'll let you guess the ethnicity of the fat female lawyer who toured the media to whine this was mysoginy and that the government had to forcefully make a man who has sex with a woman forever financially responsible for her.
She kept saying ''but think of the children, think of the children''. The mom already got alot of child support from the father. The children were fine. Stop (((lying))).