There really isn't another definition of art other than "what people like."

That's why I believe Ferber openly states that "CP has negligible artist value, and we don't care regardless." Because people could argue it does and likely win legally because if it didn't then works like Lolita or American Beauty would have to be banned to maintain the consistency.

CP can be easily legislated because it involves real children and society has come together to agree that any involvement from them is damaging. Period. So no arguments can be made against that hard wall.

Which is why the lolicon question is a trap. Since it lacks that one unquestioning brick to anchor to, any attempt to legally fight it will be a losing battle of letting the government have open season to define something undefinable. Which they will absolutely use for them and the other elites' benefit over protecting children.