Basically the title. Old game but I finally got it on sale, I don't care about fighting for the invading brown people, especially when I'm roleplaying as a Rennaisance-era Christian European. What were they thinking.
AC1: I'm an Arab ninja taking out Crusaders currently invading my homeland. Great.
AC2: I'm a rennaisance Italian ninja in a blood feud against another family of rennaisance Italians. Perfect.
AC2B: I'm the same Italian ninja liberating Rome from the the invading corrupt Italians. This makes sense.
AC2R: I'm the same Italian and I'm siding with the Turks in crushing the remenants of Constantinople. What. The OBVIOUS choice was liberating Constantinople from invading corrupt Ottomans. Byzantines who, wait for it, would have called themselves ROMANS at the time. This was so obvious, what were they smoking.
EDIT: Everything else was great though. I enjoyed the cutscenes and the Altair-Ezio-Desmond finale. But the gameplay story (ie most of the fucking game) was ass.
Imagine playing Ubisoft games.
I just started playing the better AC. Fires of Rubicon.
Ac6 was real slick. Felt great to play, controls were solid, gameplay was smooth with no bugs. Lots of git gud moments.
Definitely. I find that I really suck against enemy ACs. Maybe I just have yet to figure out a good way to take on higher-mobility opponents.
Partially build issue, partially skill issue. I struggled with some faster mechs because I wasn't using the right guns, or I was miss timing the bigger guns I was using. Usually you can time shots and wreck the faster ones.