It's funny because literally no one would know you had herpes if you didn't sleep around. You'd be less likely to catch it in the first place, in fact, it'd probably go damn near extinct if the social contract was put into its rightful place.
Now no one wants your ugly, smelly, diseased vagina. Deal with. If I had cysts and warts on my dick no one would want to come near me - the stigma exists for a good reason.
"STDs wouldn't exist if we had the social contract of yore" is provably false and a retard level take.
Sexual Disease was so rampant in the 1500-1700s that wigs and makeup to cover syphilis scars were accepted into mainstream culture which persists to this day.
More extreme measures would be required for the desired outcome.
Natural selection maybe, but part of "social contract" is illustrating these people for being exactly as disgusting as they are - making them feel shame for it. There is an entire social strata that you are ignoring that makes certain traits more or less desirable; reward and ostracization are two of the most potent factors within this domain, especially with women since they are a creature of flock consensus. The problem is we liberated them - everywhere you see this, this mistake is/was made.
Everything that you're seeing now is a push towards shamelessness. And you are correct in that "social contract" often does fall apart, it has a lifespan, but to say that it has never worked is absolute foolishness. That's like civilization should never be tried, because all civilizations have failed and will fail.
The extreme measures are part of enforcing this contract, or rather, establishing a new one.
It's funny because literally no one would know you had herpes if you didn't sleep around. You'd be less likely to catch it in the first place, in fact, it'd probably go damn near extinct if the social contract was put into its rightful place.
Now no one wants your ugly, smelly, diseased vagina. Deal with. If I had cysts and warts on my dick no one would want to come near me - the stigma exists for a good reason.
"STDs wouldn't exist if we had the social contract of yore" is provably false and a retard level take.
Sexual Disease was so rampant in the 1500-1700s that wigs and makeup to cover syphilis scars were accepted into mainstream culture which persists to this day.
"The social contract" was always a lie.
Retard. Even more so, if that was barely keeping a lid on this shit you definitely don't want it gone altogether. Also, the where and when matters.
The point is it never worked in the history of the West and "going back" to it won't work either.
More extreme measures would be required for the desired outcome.
Natural selection maybe, but part of "social contract" is illustrating these people for being exactly as disgusting as they are - making them feel shame for it. There is an entire social strata that you are ignoring that makes certain traits more or less desirable; reward and ostracization are two of the most potent factors within this domain, especially with women since they are a creature of flock consensus. The problem is we liberated them - everywhere you see this, this mistake is/was made.
Everything that you're seeing now is a push towards shamelessness. And you are correct in that "social contract" often does fall apart, it has a lifespan, but to say that it has never worked is absolute foolishness. That's like civilization should never be tried, because all civilizations have failed and will fail.
The extreme measures are part of enforcing this contract, or rather, establishing a new one.
I don't think you understand how extreme I want. I view even the peaks of prudishness as being too weakhanded.