But Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) isn’t sure about the legislation. After all, he said on Wednesday, “passing a tax bill that makes the president look good — mailing out checks before the election — means he could be reelected, and then we won’t extend the 2017 tax cuts.”
Never mind that the mailing-out-checks thing is explicitly prohibited in the bill’s language.
Never mind that tax refunds can come by check and that’s exactly what this would do in many cases.
there was an outlier: among Republicans, views were much more split between seeking compromise or holding a hard line, even if it meant that nothing got done.
Because if “compromise” is consistently in favor of one side it isn’t really compromise.
if a change was made to the child tax credit, wouldn't that be applied to the 2024 tax year and not the 2023 tax year? can you even retroactively apply a tax code after that tax year has finished?
Never mind that tax refunds can come by check and that’s exactly what this would do in many cases.
Because if “compromise” is consistently in favor of one side it isn’t really compromise.
if a change was made to the child tax credit, wouldn't that be applied to the 2024 tax year and not the 2023 tax year? can you even retroactively apply a tax code after that tax year has finished?
It's enough to fool retards, which is all that matters.