There's a scene with Oppenheimer defends his work on the Manhattan Project to his friend by saying, "It's not your people that are being targeted." Because Oppy is a jew. What strikes me is he defends the leftist in the Spanish Civil War despite them killing Catholics and raping nuns. I'm not a blame the jooz guy but I find it interesting that defending the Jewish community is good, but destroying a Christian community isn't even a consideration when picking sides.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (144)
sorted by:
Accepting those false dichotomies is the primary objective. Just like with GamerGate, the purpose was to maintain loyalists by radicalizing the environment. You want to make people too scared to side with the opposition if you are failing to control them. This is why it's "Go Broke, Get Woke, Croak." They actually resort to identitarianism as a tactic to protect themselves. Much in the same way identitarianism became popular just as soon as both the TEA Party & Occupy Wallstreet started to have overlapping interests.
If you can get women to blame men, and men to blame women, then you get to profit off of the conflict. If you can only get women to blame men; or only men to blame women, you aren't fighting a culture war, you just look like you're trying to find an outlet for your failures.
The Marxist historical dialectic depends on the proletariat-bourgeoise false dichotomy in order to exist at all. It normally doesn't happen naturally, so they try to force it. The rich will blame the poor if the rich actually think the Socialists are poor; when in fact, they are just lower-upper class competitors.
This equation works every time, which is why Intersectionalism was founded to unify them.