If I'm remembering the elements of this right, this could be huge. According to my recollection on what Bigtree and Siri have shown on this before, the V-safe comments were an optional fill-in segment for reports on this particular system, where those reporting adverse events had a choice of several tickboxes to categorise their adverse event.

Just as we've seen with the rigged data-gathering throughout all this, there were shenanigans going on from the start, in the choice of categories that people were given to pick from - so that people would be given too vague of an option, or their closest pick to their problem might be a less severe-sounding reaction, time frames being made too narrow for people to include their own reaction, stuff like that. Judging the AE rates from these submissions alone, the jabs still looked terrible in terms of safety profile . But some of the most severe AEs, ones with unusual circumstances, and even some of the more common of the known vaxx side effects might technically have had to be listed under 'Other', with only the user's comment to describe it. There were lots and lots of these.

The CDC looked at basically NONE of them and certainly didn't want heretics outside the medico-scientismo priesthood seeing them. Also due to the nature of all this stuff being lumped under 'Other', they would have previously been excluded from the rates of other specific types of injury, whereas now they can be properly identified and re-categorised. The CDC vaxx promotion and the wider narrative hinged off the bullshitted, hidden version of this data. IDK if I share Bigtree's optimism but I can see why he's saying 'I think this is gonna be the death blow to this cover-up'. They're going to need more big new psyops to bullshit this one away.