If the idiots on our side would stop taking the moral high ground and decline jury duty every time because they rightly have a conflict of interest and doom people to leftist mobs in the form of juries, maybe we could change something.
The courts forbid exculpatory evidence. For example if the woman bringing forward the accusation has been previously convicted for bringing false rape reports, that fact may not be presented in court.
Even certain history of the specific relationship may not be presented, depending on what state you are in.
If the accused is in a state that has Affirmative Consent Laws, AKA Yes Means Yes laws, the male will have to prove that consent was not withdrawn.
If the idiots on our side would stop taking the moral high ground and decline jury duty every time because they rightly have a conflict of interest and doom people to leftist mobs in the form of juries, maybe we could change something.
This. Keep your conflict of interest to yourself and be a juror.
I have decided if I ever get picked as juror I'd vote guilty for blacks and not guilty for whites regardless of evidences
So you'd let rapist whites go free? Idiot.
The courts forbid exculpatory evidence. For example if the woman bringing forward the accusation has been previously convicted for bringing false rape reports, that fact may not be presented in court.
Even certain history of the specific relationship may not be presented, depending on what state you are in.
If the accused is in a state that has Affirmative Consent Laws, AKA Yes Means Yes laws, the male will have to prove that consent was not withdrawn.
[Redacted]