I saw the rest of that clip, and the panel argues that porn can be healthier than politics. They are dead wrong. Yes, some politics can be harmful (i.e., Leftism) and some political commentary that leads to bad policies (i..e, open borders, no fault divorce, etc.,) are very bad indeed.

However, rooted politics in moral foundations designed to build societal infrastructure (i.e., how first world nations came to be) are extremely healthy, and it's how all those whores are able to sit there and spew their nonsense about porn being better than politics. Because without those political foundations for first world nations (which were actually, usually, rooted in religious foundations), there would be no society.

Porn, however, has no positive outcome. There is no societal growth. There is no productivity upswing because it produces nothing; it only degenerates. That is its end goal. There is no flip-side to porn where a healthy, burgeoning society can emerge. It literally rots the gray matter of your brain, and eventually causes irreparable neurological damage due to how it creates skewed development and functionality of the substantia nigra's role in how you seek risks/rewards, and malforms the ventral tegmental and the way you process those rewards. It creates addictive responses in how people seek dopamine hits, identical to drug addicts.

I really wish Charlie would have asked them, "Is there such a thing as a healthy heroin addict?" because most of them would have said "No", and then he could have replied, "So if porn does to your brain what heroin does to your brain, why do you think that's healthy for you in the long run?"

I would have been curious to see what their response would have been.