Did you get on the STEM course on a dodgeball scholarship or something? Because those math credits seem to have been utterly wasted, but you're an absolute pro at dodging questions.
If God did not exist, the applicability of mathematics would be just a happy coincidence. 2. The applicability of mathematics is not just a happy coincidence. 3. Therefore, God exists.
Still waiting for you to deal with that argument. If you recall, all you’ve done so far is bitch, spout non-sequitors, and insult the intelligence of others
It's clause two that is an unprovable overstatement
Addressed that looong ago
The rest has been repeatedly trying to hammer into you that big number =/= infinite, no matter how much you repeat it arbitrarily as you gishgallop between irrelevant gibberish like lottery fraud instead of attempting a rigorous proof.
And you're the one flinging out retard instead of a rebuttal in a petulant little tantrum. Nothing I've said about your intelligence has been insulting, it's been quite charitable frankly given what's been demonstrated so far.
Go back to your first statement, where you effectively claim everyone who perceives existence as possessing meaning is stupid. You’re the one who kicked things off on a poor foot. I made a logical argument to start a discussion, you made a judgement and placed yourself above everyone with a different understanding. The fact you don’t understand limits is just the cherry on top.
I didn't say finding meaning is stupid. I said many people clearly struggle with discerning coincidence from causation when the coincidence is improbable enough.
An observation directly relevant to the flawed argument that the coincidence of laws of physics that lead to life is so improbable that it can't be coincidence.
I'm fine with the concept of differing belief systems, just don't make a mockery of math in attempt to validate yours as the only "correct" belief or I'm just gonna make a mockery of you.
Did you get on the STEM course on a dodgeball scholarship or something? Because those math credits seem to have been utterly wasted, but you're an absolute pro at dodging questions.
Still waiting for you to deal with that argument. If you recall, all you’ve done so far is bitch, spout non-sequitors, and insult the intelligence of others
Addressed that looong ago
The rest has been repeatedly trying to hammer into you that big number =/= infinite, no matter how much you repeat it arbitrarily as you gishgallop between irrelevant gibberish like lottery fraud instead of attempting a rigorous proof.
And you're the one flinging out retard instead of a rebuttal in a petulant little tantrum. Nothing I've said about your intelligence has been insulting, it's been quite charitable frankly given what's been demonstrated so far.
Go back to your first statement, where you effectively claim everyone who perceives existence as possessing meaning is stupid. You’re the one who kicked things off on a poor foot. I made a logical argument to start a discussion, you made a judgement and placed yourself above everyone with a different understanding. The fact you don’t understand limits is just the cherry on top.
I didn't say finding meaning is stupid. I said many people clearly struggle with discerning coincidence from causation when the coincidence is improbable enough.
An observation directly relevant to the flawed argument that the coincidence of laws of physics that lead to life is so improbable that it can't be coincidence.
I'm fine with the concept of differing belief systems, just don't make a mockery of math in attempt to validate yours as the only "correct" belief or I'm just gonna make a mockery of you.