They’re defined as such by the equations they’re used in
Equations don't create the universe, they describe it.
This goes to what I originally wrote about "effect therefore cause" reasoning, which is what you're doing here (you really should reread it). Our universe is described by equations with particular values (effect) so therefore according to you some creator picked those particular values (cause).
You can't start from the effect and know the cause. Effect can suggest a cause, and then you go off and prove that's indeed the cause of the effect, if it is. Here you'd go off and prove God exists and created the universe a particular way. Instead you've taken the effect and proclaimed it's proof of the cause - which is actually magical, backwards thinking.
Unfortunately invoking the magical idol of “Anthropic Principle” is no argument
Unfortunately for you, creating a magical strawman isn't an argument. How many universes are there? Do you understand the reason now why you can't answer any of these questions I've posed? You shouldn't feel bad about not knowing; nobody has answers other than the universe exists (to us) and is how it is.
Equations don't create the universe, they describe it.
Do humans invent math or discover it?
Effect can suggest a cause
Effect: an ordered, non-random universe which appears to contain meaning and operate based on the principles of math and logic, all hallmarks of intelligence
Suggested cause: an intelligent design
and then you go off and prove that's indeed the cause of the effect
Elaborated proof: the post I linked to in the first place
How many universes are there
One, hence “uni-verse”
Do you understand the reason now why you can't answer any of these questions I've posed? You shouldn't feel bad about not knowing; nobody has answers other than the universe exists (to us) and is how it is.
Equations don't create the universe, they describe it.
This goes to what I originally wrote about "effect therefore cause" reasoning, which is what you're doing here (you really should reread it). Our universe is described by equations with particular values (effect) so therefore according to you some creator picked those particular values (cause).
You can't start from the effect and know the cause. Effect can suggest a cause, and then you go off and prove that's indeed the cause of the effect, if it is. Here you'd go off and prove God exists and created the universe a particular way. Instead you've taken the effect and proclaimed it's proof of the cause - which is actually magical, backwards thinking.
Unfortunately for you, creating a magical strawman isn't an argument. How many universes are there? Do you understand the reason now why you can't answer any of these questions I've posed? You shouldn't feel bad about not knowing; nobody has answers other than the universe exists (to us) and is how it is.
Do humans invent math or discover it?
Effect: an ordered, non-random universe which appears to contain meaning and operate based on the principles of math and logic, all hallmarks of intelligence
Suggested cause: an intelligent design
Elaborated proof: the post I linked to in the first place
One, hence “uni-verse”
Again, just restating the Anthropic Principle.
Prove it.
That’s what we observe.
Debunk the observation.
Ha ha. Your proof is... the anthropic principle.
You're boring me.