it's still vastly too small to be effectively 1/∞, infinitely too small technically.
Except for the inferred fact that the universe is on the order of 1x10^60 plank time units old. You could perform a random operation literally as often as is physically possible and still be more orders of magnitude away from the magnitude of the VERY FIRST TERM IN A 27+ TERM MULIPLICATION than you started (122 exp - 60 exp = 62 exp, 62>60).
That is, like the randomly shuffled deck of cards(10^67), effectively infinite. You will NEVER be able to achieve what we observe through random chance, and that’s according to the very Standard Model which you bow to.
Putting aside my complete lack of inclination to check your ever moving goalposts of asspulled napkin math for a moment.
These are probabilities. It can take anywhere from 1 to X attempts to actually attain the random result being calculated for in practice. You don't just unlock the result automatically once you try the statistically most probable number of combinations. Guessing the right answer even on the first guess isn't proof of design, it's still congruent with just being incredibly lucky. That whole "the universe isn't old enough to try shuffling enough combinations of physical laws" shtick doesn't work because it is random, the universe was old enough as soon as it existed, with enough luck.
Nevermind that no-one outside of an asylum would propose a universe that randomly shifted physical laws on a plank time scale (interesting that that is the only constant you didn't treat as variable here, almost like it served some purpose to bias the asspull math) until life appeared then just stopped to have observably constant physical laws. But even that bizarre thought experiment is fundamentally wrong, because you are still confusing highly unlikely with impossible.
Except for the inferred fact that the universe is on the order of 1x10^60 plank time units old. You could perform a random operation literally as often as is physically possible and still be more orders of magnitude away from the magnitude of the VERY FIRST TERM IN A 27+ TERM MULIPLICATION than you started (122 exp - 60 exp = 62 exp, 62>60).
That is, like the randomly shuffled deck of cards(10^67), effectively infinite. You will NEVER be able to achieve what we observe through random chance, and that’s according to the very Standard Model which you bow to.
Putting aside my complete lack of inclination to check your ever moving goalposts of asspulled napkin math for a moment.
These are probabilities. It can take anywhere from 1 to X attempts to actually attain the random result being calculated for in practice. You don't just unlock the result automatically once you try the statistically most probable number of combinations. Guessing the right answer even on the first guess isn't proof of design, it's still congruent with just being incredibly lucky. That whole "the universe isn't old enough to try shuffling enough combinations of physical laws" shtick doesn't work because it is random, the universe was old enough as soon as it existed, with enough luck.
Nevermind that no-one outside of an asylum would propose a universe that randomly shifted physical laws on a plank time scale (interesting that that is the only constant you didn't treat as variable here, almost like it served some purpose to bias the asspull math) until life appeared then just stopped to have observably constant physical laws. But even that bizarre thought experiment is fundamentally wrong, because you are still confusing highly unlikely with impossible.