Oh look we've hit the "made up pseudoscience and flimsy claims of priestly expertise" section.
No it doesn't suffice to just arbitrarily say that the probability we're discussing approaches 1/∞, because that's wrong and you're a fucking quack. Go ahead and prove it, literally prove it. It doesn't matter if you think I will understand it or not, if you actually understand it and are certain it's true then you'll already have the proof ready to go so you can go on record as "not full of shit".
both outcomes are equally statistically likely
Haha, I didn't expect the answer to "are you seriously going to pretend that didn't happen?" to be "unironically yes, now let's completely change the hypothetical. Checkmate"
Oh look we've hit the "made up pseudoscience and flimsy claims of priestly expertise" section.
No it doesn't suffice to just arbitrarily say that the probability we're discussing approaches 1/∞, because that's wrong and you're a fucking quack. Go ahead and prove it, literally prove it. It doesn't matter if you think I will understand it or not, if you actually understand it and are certain it's true then you'll already have the proof ready to go so you can go on record as "not full of shit".
Haha, I didn't expect the answer to "are you seriously going to pretend that didn't happen?" to be "unironically yes, now let's completely change the hypothetical. Checkmate"