OP: "Why should water, another of the keys to life, be the only common substance with a solid density less than its liquid density? .. Why should ... Why should"
There's no "should" or "should not" there's only "does" or "does not". Our universe exists, to us, and functions the way it does. This is the only fact we know about it.
It could have been made by an Entity, or by random, or every other universe even possible may also exist, or even be a fractal that doesn't exist at all; your "life" being a function of your position in an equation, like a digit in Pi. The 10 millionth digit in Pi doesn't actually exist (but it thinks it does).
This is "effect therefore cause" reasoning and it's obviously backwards. You can argue the cause is a creator and the effect is the universe, but you can't argue the effect is the universe so the cause is a creator.
Liberals do this backward reasoning all the fucking time. Like in Ferguson, Eric Holder said 90% of convictions were black (effect) so therefore it was due to racism (cause). Speeding tickets, SAT scores, everything - it's always disparate effect therefore cause is racism.
There's no "should" or "should not" there's only "does" or "does not". Our universe exists, to us, and functions the way it does. This is the only fact we know about it.
Correct, and the possibility of the universe randomly deciding to operate based on logic is so infinitesimally small as to be impossible. Thus the only logical conclusion is that it is non-random. Non-random creation == Design
It doesn't; it just exists or doesn't exist. Go back and reread the first comment I wrote.
Nice dodge. You said the chance is the universe exists the way it does is "infinitesimally small", well how do you know that? You're an expert in how universes come to exist?
OP: "Why should water, another of the keys to life, be the only common substance with a solid density less than its liquid density? .. Why should ... Why should"
There's no "should" or "should not" there's only "does" or "does not". Our universe exists, to us, and functions the way it does. This is the only fact we know about it.
It could have been made by an Entity, or by random, or every other universe even possible may also exist, or even be a fractal that doesn't exist at all; your "life" being a function of your position in an equation, like a digit in Pi. The 10 millionth digit in Pi doesn't actually exist (but it thinks it does).
This is "effect therefore cause" reasoning and it's obviously backwards. You can argue the cause is a creator and the effect is the universe, but you can't argue the effect is the universe so the cause is a creator.
Liberals do this backward reasoning all the fucking time. Like in Ferguson, Eric Holder said 90% of convictions were black (effect) so therefore it was due to racism (cause). Speeding tickets, SAT scores, everything - it's always disparate effect therefore cause is racism.
Correct, and the possibility of the universe randomly deciding to operate based on logic is so infinitesimally small as to be impossible. Thus the only logical conclusion is that it is non-random. Non-random creation == Design
What's the chance of it randomly deciding to operate on logic? It could be 100% for all you know.
How does a mindless (Godless) universe “decide” anything?
It doesn't; it just exists or doesn't exist. Go back and reread the first comment I wrote.
Nice dodge. You said the chance is the universe exists the way it does is "infinitesimally small", well how do you know that? You're an expert in how universes come to exist?