Haha, either you're very confused about limit theory or you are for the third time now trying to say that a very small probability is a limit approaching infinity without any understanding that those are fundamentally different terms.
That's like saying a number must be irrational because you got bored of counting after 10 decimal places.
And the fact that a guy would potentially win a <900 buck lottery (the house always wins after all) and continue to play and win isn't weird. It's only weird in your mind because you're ascribing that 1/1000 chance to a lottery where you win millions, which financially wouldn't exist. It feels wrong because your extraneous suppositions are wrong, not because serial probabilities are magic
Heh, you can try petty name calling instead of trying to defend your mistakes all you like, but no amount of pathetic jabs are going to make me forget how to use infinities properly.
For example if you increased total mass and number of equivalent star systems in the universe 1000x, the chance of earth-like life randomly emerging would not change if it was "infinitely improbable", because 1000x infinity is still just infinity. But that's stupid, the chance obviously goes up as the number of planets capable of generating earth-like life goes up, because it's not infinitely improbable, just very improbable.
one mane winning three consecutive lotteries is no weirder than one man winning a single
Are you seriously going to pretend you don't remember admitting you set up that arbitrary hypothetical so that both outcomes are equally statistically likely? Stripping out the numbers and going "HurR DuRr, Me SpEll MaN WroNg" isn't going to make that look any less desperate son.
Once again you demonstrate you don’t understand limits. There’s no point wasting my time trying to teach you math which is clearly years beyond your ken. Suffice it to say the probability we are discussing approaches 1/∞ as we include the 27 independent fundemental variables of the Standard Model. Can you name any of these variables?
both outcomes are equally statistically likely?
So you still don’t have even the slightest idea how humans and the lottery work. Stunning. Give this a read and let me know if it clicks for you or if you need more help:
Ok, so you don’t understand limit theory, that might be a good place for you to start.
The fact that you quoted the “why” and still ask this is sad, I don’t know how to spell it out more than it already has been. Try rereading that part.
Haha, either you're very confused about limit theory or you are for the third time now trying to say that a very small probability is a limit approaching infinity without any understanding that those are fundamentally different terms.
That's like saying a number must be irrational because you got bored of counting after 10 decimal places.
And the fact that a guy would potentially win a <900 buck lottery (the house always wins after all) and continue to play and win isn't weird. It's only weird in your mind because you're ascribing that 1/1000 chance to a lottery where you win millions, which financially wouldn't exist. It feels wrong because your extraneous suppositions are wrong, not because serial probabilities are magic
Bandy confirmed clinically retarded - here you go Champ, let me spell it out for you yet again
Does baby understand the application of limits yet? Or does baby need another day with khan academy?
Dude, cmon, you don’t need to keep proving yourself retarded. It’s ok I’m fully convinced at this point.
Heh, you can try petty name calling instead of trying to defend your mistakes all you like, but no amount of pathetic jabs are going to make me forget how to use infinities properly.
For example if you increased total mass and number of equivalent star systems in the universe 1000x, the chance of earth-like life randomly emerging would not change if it was "infinitely improbable", because 1000x infinity is still just infinity. But that's stupid, the chance obviously goes up as the number of planets capable of generating earth-like life goes up, because it's not infinitely improbable, just very improbable.
Are you seriously going to pretend you don't remember admitting you set up that arbitrary hypothetical so that both outcomes are equally statistically likely? Stripping out the numbers and going "HurR DuRr, Me SpEll MaN WroNg" isn't going to make that look any less desperate son.
Once again you demonstrate you don’t understand limits. There’s no point wasting my time trying to teach you math which is clearly years beyond your ken. Suffice it to say the probability we are discussing approaches 1/∞ as we include the 27 independent fundemental variables of the Standard Model. Can you name any of these variables?
So you still don’t have even the slightest idea how humans and the lottery work. Stunning. Give this a read and let me know if it clicks for you or if you need more help:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_Lotto_fraud_scandal
If you’re still stuck after that article, go on and google “lottery fraud” some more.